Often when people begin training martial arts, they are torn between striking and grappling. Although you can train both simultaneously, this is a hard ask and requires a lot of time and dedication. So, for the most part – people usually stick to one discipline over the other. In this article, we shall be looking at what is harder to learn, between grappling and striking.
Table of Contents
What is harder to learn – grappling or striking?
The level of difficulty in learning grappling versus striking can vary depending on various factors, including an individual’s background, physical attributes, and personal preferences. It’s challenging to make a definitive statement about which one is universally harder to learn, as it can differ from person to person.
Grappling, which includes disciplines like Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, wrestling, sambo and judo, focuses on techniques involving clinching, takedowns, and ground-based submissions. Learning grappling requires developing a solid understanding of body mechanics, leverage, and positional control, along with honing reflexes and grappling-specific skills. It can take time to become proficient in grappling, as it often involves intricate details and a deeper understanding of the nuances involved in manipulating an opponent’s body.
On the other hand, striking arts such as boxing, kickboxing, or Muay Thai involve learning various striking techniques, footwork, and defensive maneuvers. Striking requires coordination, timing, speed, and the ability to generate power and accuracy with strikes. It involves developing striking technique, reading an opponent’s movements, and understanding distance and timing.
Both grappling and striking have their own complexities and learning curves. Some individuals may find grappling more challenging due to its technical nature and emphasis on control and submissions, while others may find striking more difficult due to the coordination and timing required for effective striking. Ultimately, the difficulty of learning grappling or striking depends on the individual’s aptitude, dedication, and the quality of instruction they receive.
What is harder on the body, grappling or striking?
Both grappling and striking can place different demands on the body and have the potential to be physically challenging. The specific impact on the body can vary depending on factors such as the intensity of training, individual technique, conditioning level, and the frequency and duration of practice.
Grappling involves close-contact techniques, including takedowns, submissions, and ground fighting. It requires strength, flexibility, and endurance, as well as the ability to exert force and withstand pressure from an opponent. The physical demands of grappling can result in muscle soreness, joint strain, and the potential for injuries such as sprains, strains, or dislocations. The repetitive movements and positions involved in grappling can also lead to wear and tear on the body over time.
Striking arts involve various striking techniques using punches, kicks, knees, and elbows, which require coordination, speed, power, and accuracy. The impact from strikes can put stress on the joints, particularly the wrists and ankles, and may cause bruises, contusions, or even fractures. Additionally, the repetitive nature of striking training can lead to overuse injuries such as tendonitis or stress fractures.
It’s important to note that the risk of injury in both grappling and striking can be mitigated by proper training techniques, conditioning, and appropriate safety measures. Additionally, the intensity and duration of training sessions can be adjusted to individual fitness levels and recovery abilities.
Ultimately, the impact on the body in grappling or striking depends on factors such as the individual’s technique, conditioning, and how they train. Both disciplines have the potential to be physically demanding and carry some risk of injury, but with proper training and precautions, these risks can be minimized.
What is better in self defense, grappling or striking?
When it comes to self-defense, both grappling and striking can be effective depending on the situation and individual preferences. It’s important to note that self-defense scenarios can vary greatly, and the best approach often depends on the specific circumstances, including the environment, number of attackers, and the defender’s own abilities and training.
Grappling can be advantageous in close-quarters situations where physical contact is inevitable. It focuses on techniques such as takedowns, clinches, and submissions, which can help control and neutralize an attacker. Grappling can be particularly useful when dealing with a single opponent or when the goal is to restrain or incapacitate without causing excessive harm. It can also provide valuable skills for defending against grabs, holds, or ground-based attacks.
On the other hand, striking techniques can be effective for creating distance, disorienting an attacker, and providing an opportunity to escape. Strikes like punches, kicks, and knees can target vulnerable areas of the body, allowing the defender to deliver powerful blows. Striking can be advantageous when dealing with multiple attackers or when a quick, decisive response is necessary to create an opening for escape.
It’s worth noting that a well-rounded self-defense approach often incorporates elements of both grappling and striking. Training in a martial art that combines both aspects, such as mixed martial arts (MMA), can provide a broader skill set and increase overall effectiveness in self-defense situations.
Ultimately, the “better” approach in self-defense depends on various factors, including the specific circumstances, the defender’s skill level and physical attributes, and personal preference. It’s recommended to seek proper training, practice situational awareness, and consider a holistic approach that includes both grappling and striking techniques for a well-rounded self-defense strategy.
Summary
Overall, it really depends on the individual. Having said this, the general consensus is that learning grappling is more difficult compared to striking. This is because striking is more natural and humans have been punching each other for millennia. On the other hand, grappling is generally more alien and is more nuanced.
At the same time, this doesn’t mean that you should dismiss striking or grappling. Both have their own benefits and ultimately it depends on what you’re looking for as a martial artist. As long as you train hard and properly, there is no reason why you won’t eventually progress into an expert.
